Biplan I.I.Steglau. Some conclusions
| to Pass to sections: Biplan I.I.Steglau At the same time it is possible to influence them and rukoju the pilot, and it is necessary it to do it constantly at turns, and big enough effort for counteraction is required to this automatic mechanism. From the further airplanes of competition from among Russian designs much the interesting promised a monoplane inzh, I - to M.Gakkelja in view of variety of the improvements applied in it. Destruction of any racks and cables over wings of an airplane was the main thing from them and transferring of all fastening covered downwards. Etokreplenie it has been made by means of easy system balochek, cables and easy metal pipes. Unfortunately, tests of this device in flight it has not been started. Biplan J.M. of Gakkelja already multilaterally was tested in flights and on it, besides several flights between cities, good flights on height ' have been made. Some conclusions by results of military competition of airplanes of 1913 are resulted also in N.B.Vorobeva's article in № 9 and 10 magazines ' Technics of aeronautics ' for 1913г. |
At all big weight this device had a good line of flight. In flight it seemed rather steady that, obviously, it is necessary to attribute not ' avtomaticheskojstabilizatsii ' its rather primitive device, and to a correct arrangement of the centre of gravity. 
Other airplane inzh. Gakkelja - biplan - also was not tested in flight, since. The motor established on it in 100 h.p. Mechanics inzh. Gakkelja had not time to adjust, and it, under the statement of pilot Alehnovicha, not davaldostatochnoj for draught flight. 
